Date: 20040216
 
Docket: IMM-1070-04
 
Citation: 2004 FC 241
 
Toronto, Ontario, February 16th, 2004
 
Present:            The Honourable Mr. Justice von Finckenstein                                   
 
 
BETWEEN:
 
                                                   FRANCIS SEBAMALAI FIGURADO
 
                                                                                                                                                         Applicant
                                                                                   and
 
 
                                            THE SOLICITOR GENERAL FOR CANADA
 
                                                                                                                                                     Respondent
 
 
                                                 REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER
(Delivered orally from the bench and written subsequently
for precision and clarification)
 
[1]                  This stay application arises from a negative Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA) dated December 9th, 2003.
 
[2]                  To succeed in a stay application, an applicant must satisfy each element of the test set out in Toth v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) (1988), 86 N.R.302 (F.C.A.).
 
[3]                  Before this Court, the Applicant argued that there were serious issues to be tried, namely that the PRRA Officer:
 
a) did not properly assess the risk faced by the Applicant at the hands of the LTTE but rather assessed only the risk generally faced by Tamil returnees; and
 
b) erred in law by finding that there was state protection available to the Applicant in Sri Lanka.
 
[4]                  A close reading of the PRRA Officer's decision reveals that neither of these allegations is supportable. The PRRA Officer, on the basis of the evidence submitted to her, addressed the risks faced by the Applicant (pages 9 and 11 of the Applicant's Record) as well as the state protection available in Sri Lanka  (page 11 of the Applicant's Record).
 
[5]                  The evidence before the PRRA Officer was quite sufficient to support her findings.
 
[6]                  What the Applicant really asks for under the rubric of "serious issue" is a re-weighing of the evidence before the PRRA Officer.
 
[7]                  Such a request does not satisfy the requirement of "serious issue" under Toth, supra. See Thangasivan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), Court File IMM-986-03, 23 November, 2003 (unreported).
 
[8]                  Accordingly, this request for a stay is denied.
 
                                                                              ORDER
 
THIS COURT ORDERS that the motion for a stay of the execution of the removal order is dismissed.                                      
 
               "K. von Finckenstein"

                                                                                                                                                                 J.F.C.                           
 
 
 
 
 
FEDERAL COURT
                                NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
 
 
 DOCKET:                                                     IMM-1070-04
 
STYLE OF CAUSE:                                    FRANCIS SEBAMALAI FIGURADO
                                                                                                                                                           Applicant
 
and
 
THE SOLICITOR GENERAL FOR CANADA
 
                                                                                                                                                       Respondent
 
PLACE OF HEARING:                            TORONTO, ONTARIO
 
DATE OF HEARING:                                FEBRUARY 16, 2004
 
REASONS FOR ORDER
AND ORDER BY :                                    von FINCKENSTEIN J.
 
 DATED:                                                         FEBRUARY 16, 2004
 
APPEARANCES:
 
Ms. Brena Parnes
FOR APPLICANT
 
Ms. Mielka Visnic
FOR RESPONDENT
 
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
 
Waldman  &   Associates                                 
Toronto, Ontario
FOR APPLICANT
                                                                                     
Morris Rosenberg                                                                           
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
FOR RESPONDENT
 
 
                            FEDERAL COURT
TRIAL DIVISION
                                              
 
 
Date: 20040216
 
Docket: IMM-1070-04
 
 
BETWEEN:
 
 
FRANCIS SEBAMALAI FIGURADO
                                                                                           
                                                                           Applicant
 
 
 
and
 
 
THE SOLICITOR GENERAL FOR CANADA
 
                                                                       Respondent
 
 
 
 
                                                                                     
 
REASONS FOR ORDER
AND ORDER