Words and Phrases - "produce"

88
44
80
54
38
31
20
14
74
2
2
32
56
25
38
81
3
77
90
47
16
9
23
2

Biltrite Tire Co. v. The King, [1937] S.C.R. 364, 1 D.T.C. 360

The taxpayer purchased in bulk lots, by the pound, old and worn-out motor vehicle tires and put them through a process of repair, treatment (including being pressed and partially cooked in a boiler) and retreading, and sold the retreaded tires. Throughout the process the sidewall of the tire was not dismantled or destroyed, the numerical identification of the original tire was not destroyed, the name of the manufacturer of the original tire was still clearly marked upon its sidewalls. In finding that the restored sales when sold fell to be treated as “goods produced or manufactured” by the taxpayer under s. 86 (1) (a) of the Special War Revenue Act (R.S.C. 1927, c. 179) and were “tires manufactured or produced” by it under s. 80, Kerwin J stated (at pp. 366-7, SCR):

[I]f the appellant had purchased an old or worn-out tire which had already been treated by the vendor in the manner described above, down to and including the cutting off of the old tread…[and] then… had purchased from a third party the rubber preparation and had applied the latter and continued with the subsequent steps, could it be suggested that the article in its final condition had not been produced or manufactured by the appellant? The definitions of the words “manufacture” and “produce” as nouns or verbs, in the standard dictionaries, clearly indicate that such proceedings would constitute the appellant a manufacturer or producer. And the mere fact that the appellant has itself performed the defined operations on the old tire cannot exclude it from the operation of the section.

…It is suggested that the old or worn-out tire did not lose its identity qua tire and that, therefore, the appellant could not be said to have manufactured or produced a tire. However, when one bears in mind the various steps taken by appellant and particularly the state of the article when the tread was removed, it would appear that appellant cannot be any less the manufacturer of a tire because it started with something that had once been a usable tire than if, as suggested in the preceding paragraph, it had commenced with two substances purchased from different sources.

Words and Phrases
produce manufacture