Comprehensive Discussion of Our Performance
Disclaimer
We do not guarantee the accuracy of this copy of the CRA website.
Scraped Page Content
About Appeals
At the CCRA, we are responsible for managing one of the Government of Canada's largest dispute resolution services. Through the Appeals business line, we review contested decisions in income tax, goods and services tax (GST), harmonized sales tax (HST), excise tax, trade administration, customs enforcement sanction, Canada Pension Plan (CPP), and Employment Insurance (EI) cases. Clients who are not satisfied with the results of our review may appeal to the courts—or for trade administration issues, to the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT).
Our aim is to provide clients with a fair dispute resolution process, respecting Canadians' fundamental right to redress in their dealings with the federal government. To earn and keep the trust of our clients, it is essential that we have an appeals process that is fair and that also is seen to be fair. Canadians should have confidence that when they report a problem with a decision we have made, they can and will be heard, their concerns will be dealt with thoroughly and promptly, and they will be treated at all times with respect. This builds trust in the system as a whole, which in turn promotes voluntary compliance.
As of March 31, 2002, over $8 billion in income taxes, GST/HST/excise taxes, and customs duties were in dispute. These areas are the major sources of redress claims, involving some 78,000 individuals and businesses exercising their fundamental right to redress, up substantially from the approximately 57,000 who were involved in disputes a year earlier. This increase was largely the result of a significant number of income tax objections filed by former and current public servants relating to the taxability of interest received on the federal government's retroactive pay equity settlement.
To support and strengthen the application of fairness principles across all CCRA programs, the Appeals business line also co-ordinates the CCRA's Fairness Initiative. This includes overseeing the application of legislative provisions for forgiving interest and penalties to clients in special circumstances, such as hardship. Appeals is also responsible for administering the Voluntary Disclosures Program, which allows clients to correct past errors or omissions and report without penalty their tax, duty, and tariff obligations.
Some of our key activities and business line characteristics are listed below:

Spending Profile
The Appeals function is separate from other business lines to enhance its impartiality. It is also the CCRA's smallest business line, representing just 2.2% of the total CCRA budget, down from 2.3% last year. In 2001-2002, its actual spending was about $75 million, or some $7 million less than authorized and about $4 million more than last year (see Exhibit 66 ). Difficulties in reaching optimal staffing levels over the year—we operated with 7% fewer employees than planned—accounted for much of the spending shortfall.
Exhibit 66: Business Line Spending
Appeals | 1999-2000 | 2000-2001 | Percentage Increase | 2001-2002 | Percentage Increase |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Planned Spending 1 ($000)
|
67,020
|
68,332
|
2.0%
|
67,479
|
-1.2%
|
Allocation of Authorities 2 ($000)
|
73,848
|
78,388
|
6.1%
|
82,154
|
4.8%
|
Actual Spending 3 ($000)
|
69,008
|
70,989
|
2.9%
|
75,052
|
5.7%
|
Planned FTEs 4
|
1,280
|
1,272
|
-0.6%
|
1,212
|
-4.7%
|
Total FTE Authorities
|
1,310
|
1,217
|
-7.1%
|
1,227
|
0.8%
|
Actual Number of FTEs 5
|
1,123
|
1,098
|
-2.2%
|
1,141
|
3.9%
|
1 Planned Spending is the Agency published Main Estimates (spending approved by Parliament at the beginning of the fiscal year). These figures are net of respendable revenues (Revenues credited to the Vote). 2 Total spending authority provided by Parliament for the fiscal year. It includes Main Estimates plus any in-year Supplementary Estimates and year-end approvals. These figures are net of respendable revenues. 3 Actual spending is net of respendable revenues. 4 Estimates of FTEs based on Parliamentary approved Planned Spending and Authorities for dollars. 5 For 2001-2002, the allocation of Information Technology Branch resources to this business line is done on a different basis than the authorities and the previous years, making year-over-year comparison difficult. The CCRA is taking steps to better align these Authorities and Actual data by business line. |
As shown in Exhibit 67 , all of the Appeals business line's activities and resources support the facilitation of voluntary compliance through channels such as publications, case information services, and the timely provision of fair dispute resolution. A general discussion of the compliance continuum can be found beginning on .
Exhibit 67: Total Appeals Resources Allocated to the Compliance Continuum for 2001-2002 ($ million)
.

- Date modified:
- 2002-11-07