Section 93.4

Subsection 93.4(1)

Foreign Accrual Business Income

Articles

Bryan Madorsky, Rachel Gold, "Department of Finance reintroduce anti-deferral rules for FAPI of CCPCs and substantive CCPCs", International Tax (Wolters Kluwer), October 2025, No. 144, p. 1

FABI rules permit deferral (p.2)

  • Although Canadian-controlled private corporations (CCPCs) that earn investment income indirectly through a controlled foreign affiliate (CFA) will no longer be eligible for a full deferral of Canadian corporate tax thereon through the reduction in the relevant tax factor from 4 to 1.9, the proposed foreign accrual business income (FABI) regime allows qualifying entities to elect to regain access to the tax deferral on certain types of foreign accrual property income (FAPI).

Expansion of scope of FABI in August 2025 draft legislation (pp. 3-4)

  • In its August 15, 2025 draft legislation, Finance has significantly broadened the definition of FABI in draft s. 93.4(1), from that contained in its August 2024 draft legislation, to include any FAPI that would not be included in a CCPC’s aggregate investment income (AII) if the subject CFA were a CCPC and the income was from a source in Canada (subject to certain anti-base erosion exclusions).
  • For instance, unlike the foreign affiliate rules, the specified investment business rules that are accessed under this deeming rule do not require the business to be conducted principally with arm's length persons, and the scope of income that is treated as specified investment income is narrower. For example, income from a specified investment business product does not include profits from the disposition of investment property. Furthermore, the AII rules have no analogue to the s. 95(2)(b) rules deeming services income to be FAPI in certain circumstances.

Anti-base erosion rules (p. 4)

  • However, under the anti-base erosion provisions, FABI treatment will be denied where the payment is deductible in computing the payer's high-tax income. This includes deductions against AII, personal services business income, and FAPI other than FABI.
  • These FABI base erosion rules are similar to the base erosion provisions of s. 95(2)(b), but are narrower in scope. For example, where a CCPC pays its foreign affiliate (FA) for services, the payment will be deemed to be FAPI to the extent it is deductible in computing the CCPC's business income. However, as such amount would not be included in AII (if the FA instead were a CCPC), the payment could be eligible for FABI treatment, provided that it is deductible in computing the CCPC's income from an active business (whereas if the CCPC's business was a specified investment business, the base erosion rule would apply to prevent FABI characterization).

Joint Committee, "Summary of Feedback on Various Technical Issues", 14 April 2025 Joint Committee Submission

Needed expansion of scope of FABI (pp. 10-11)

  • As noted by commentators, the definition of foreign accrual business income (FABI) should be amended to include all income which would not be aggregate investment income had it been earned directly by the CCPC or substantive CCPC.

Christopher Montes, John Farquhar, Evan Raymer, "Mind the Gap: FABI Relief Falls Short for CCPCS", International Tax Highlights (IFA), Vol. 3, No. 4, November 2024, p. 2

Reason for FABI rule (p. 2)

  • The “relevant tax factor” (RTF) proposals released on August 9, 2022 would have subjected all foreign accrual property income (FAPI) and “taxable surplus” of foreign affiliates (FAs) of CCPCs to an RTF of 1.9 (instead of 4), so as to tax all FAPI and taxable surplus of such FAs at 52.63% rather than 25%.
  • However, to address the issue that some FAPI and taxable surplus amounts would not be aggregate investment income (AII) if earned in Canada by a CCPC, the revised RTF proposals of August 12, 2024 introduced the concepts of “foreign accrual business income” (FABI) and “FABI surplus,” which effectively are types of FAPI and taxable surplus which continue to be subject to an RTF of 4, provided that timely elections are made.

Narrowness of FABI definition (p. 3)

  • However, FABI under the s. 93.4(1) definition only includes:
    • services income under s. 95(2)(b)(i), when specified conditions are met; and
    • income from a business of developing real estate for sale, or leasing of real estate or other immovable property, that is an “investment business” but would not be an “investment business” if it were possible to meet the “five full-time employees (or equivalent)” test by counting services performed in Canada by other members of the corporate group.

FABI surplus (p. 3)

  • FABI surplus is defined to include, in addition to FABI and certain other amounts, an FA’s net earnings or net loss from an active business carried on by the FA in a country. This definition would, for example, address the situation where an FA is carrying on an active business in a foreign treaty country but is earning taxable surplus because its central management and control is in Canada.

Missing items from FABI definition (p. 3)

  • The definition of FABI does not capture income from the following, which also would not be AII where earned in Canada by a CCPC:
    • an adventure in the nature of trade;
    • the active trading of securities, currencies, or commodities;
    • the business of insuring or reinsuring risks;
    • services deemed to be FAPI under s. 95(2)(b)(ii);
    • the business of disposing of Canadian or foreign resource properties;
    • the business of developing real estate for sale with insufficient employees;
    • the business of leasing property other than real property with insufficient employees; and
    • a non-qualifying business.
  • The narrowness of the FABI definition is particularly problematic to CCPCs which, for many years, have been earning FAPI through an FA which would not be AII if earned in Canada, and would face a tax bill of roughly twice the regular rate of corporate tax if that income was repatriated to Canada for reinvestment in their domestic operations.